Kevin L. GriffithAssistant Professor Phone: 413-577-1311 Ph.D.: Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 2002 |
![]() |
Research InterestsOverview Research Summary In Bacillus subtilis, the transcription factor ComA regulates genes of the quorum response. Two signaling pathways converge to control the activity of ComA by modulating its phosphorylation state (ComX-ComP) and its ability to bind DNA (Rap-Phr) (Fig. 1). The genetic arrangement of the comX-comP signaling cassette and the regulation of ComA by cell-cell signaling have striking similarities to known virulence pathways in pathogens including S. aureus, E. faecalis, and S. pneumoniae. The rap-phr signaling cassette is conserved among different Bacillus species including the pathogens B. anthracis, B. cereus, and B. thuringensis. Studying the mechanisms of ComA regulation and dissecting the regulatory pathways controlled by cell-cell signaling should aid in our general understanding of how bacteria coordinate group behavior.
ComA binding to DNA. Our work predicts that ComA binds to DNA in an unusual manner – two dimers of ComA bind to a tri-partite sequence (Fig. 2). All three recognition elements are required for ComA to bind DNA in vitro and for transcription activation by ComA in vivo. The degeneracy of the binding sequence is an important regulatory feature for maintaining the density-dependent response. We are testing this unusual architecture for a transcriptional activator to determine how ComA regulates genes of the quorum response.
Regulatory networks controlled by ComA. Previous work from the Grossman and Tanaka laboratories demonstrated that ComA directly activates transcription of at least nine operons. We are in the process of identifying additional regulatory pathways controlled by ComA. Many of these pathways are predicted to be controlled directly by ComA, while others are predicted to be controlled indirectly through the action of regulatory factors whose expression is controlled by ComA. Several putative target genes are suspected of requiring factors in addition to ComA. Our goal is to dissect the regulatory pathways of the quorum response to determine the involvement of ComA and co-regulators in controlling gene expression. Regulation of ComA activity. Two signaling pathways converge to regulate the activity of ComA by modulating its phosphorylation state and by inhibiting its ability to bind DNA via the Rap proteins (Fig. 1). We are dissecting the regulation of ComA by these external signals to determine the effects on DNA binding and transcription activation. Defining the interplay between ComA phosphorylation and the regulation by Raps should provide a better understanding of how the quorum response is coordinated with population density.
Controllable protein degradation systems. An ongoing interest of our laboratory has been in the development of useful tools for studying regulatory networks in B. subtilis. We engineered a controllable protein degradation system that utilizes small C-terminal peptide tags (modified ssrA) and heterologous adaptor proteins (SspB) from E. coli and C. crescentus to deliver tagged proteins to the B. subtilis protease where they are rapidly degraded (Fig. 3). Expression of the adaptor protein is under inducible control allowing for controllable degradation of tagged proteins. We are using this system to study several proteins with unknown function. This protein degradation system has the potential to be modified for use in other bacteria.
Publications Griffith, K.L. and A.D. Grossman. 2008. Inducible protein degradation in Bacillus subtilis using heterologous peptide tags and adaptor proteins to target substrates to the protease ClpXP. Mol. Micro. 70: 1012-1025. Griffith, K.L. and A.D. Grossman. 2008. A degenerate tripartite DNA-binding site required for activation of ComA-dependent quorum response gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. J. Mol. Biol. 381: 261-75. Griffith, K.L., and R.E. Wolf, Jr. 2004. Genetic evidence for “Pre-recruitment” as the mechanism of transcription activation by SoxS of Escherichia coli: the dominance of DNA binding mutations of SoxS. J. Mol. Biol. 344: 1-10. Griffith, K.L.*, I.M. Shah*, and R.E. Wolf, Jr. 2004. Proteolytic degradation of Escherichia coli transcription activators SoxS and MarA as the mechanism for reversing the induction of the superoxide (SoxRS) and multiple antibiotic resistance (Mar) regulons. Mol. Micro. 51: 1801-1816. * These authors contributed equally. Griffith, K.L. and R.E. Wolf, Jr. 2002. A comprehensive alanine scanning mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli transcriptional activator SoxS: identifying amino acids important for DNA binding and transcription activation. J. Mol. Biol. 322: 237-257. Griffith, K.L.*, I.M. Shah*, T.E. Myers, M.C. O’Neill, and R.E. Wolf, Jr. 2002. Evidence for “Pre-recruitment” as a new mechanism of transcription activation in Escherichia coli: the large Griffith, K.L. and R.E. Wolf, Jr. 2002. Measuring β-galactosidase activity in bacteria: cell growth, permeabilization, and enzyme assay in 96-well arrays. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 290: 397-402. Griffith, K.L. and R.E. Wolf, Jr. 2001. Systematic mutagenesis of the DNA binding sites for SoxS in the Escherichia coli zwf and fpr promoters: identifying nucleotides required for DNA binding and transcription activation. Mol. Micro. 40: 1141-1154. Wood, T.I., K.L. Griffith, W.P. Fawcett, K-W Jair, T.D. Schneider, and R.E. Wolf, Jr. 1999. Interdependence of the position and orientation of SoxS binding sites in the transcriptional activation of the class I subset of Escherichia coli superoxide-inducible promoters. Mol. Micro. 34: 414-430. Robinson, P.R., K.L. Griffith, J.M. Gross, and M.C. O’Neill. 1999. A back-propagation neural network predicts absorption maxima of chimeric human red/green visual pigments. Vision Research. 39: 1707-1712.
|
|
Kevin Griffith
Department of Microbiology
203 Morrill Science Center IVN
University of Massachusetts
639 North Pleasant Street
Amherst, MA 01003
|
|
|
|
|