@article {438, title = {Genome-scale dynamic modeling of the competition between Rhodoferax and Geobacter in anoxic subsurface environments.}, journal = {ISME J}, volume = {5}, year = {2011}, month = {2011 Feb}, pages = {305-16}, abstract = {The advent of rapid complete genome sequencing, and the potential to capture this information in genome-scale metabolic models, provide the possibility of comprehensively modeling microbial community interactions. For example, Rhodoferax and Geobacter species are acetate-oxidizing Fe(III)-reducers that compete in anoxic subsurface environments and this competition may have an influence on the in situ bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater. Therefore, genome-scale models of Geobacter sulfurreducens and Rhodoferax ferrireducens were used to evaluate how Geobacter and Rhodoferax species might compete under diverse conditions found in a uranium-contaminated aquifer in Rifle, CO. The model predicted that at the low rates of acetate flux expected under natural conditions at the site, Rhodoferax will outcompete Geobacter as long as sufficient ammonium is available. The model also predicted that when high concentrations of acetate are added during in situ bioremediation, Geobacter species would predominate, consistent with field-scale observations. This can be attributed to the higher expected growth yields of Rhodoferax and the ability of Geobacter to fix nitrogen. The modeling predicted relative proportions of Geobacter and Rhodoferax in geochemically distinct zones of the Rifle site that were comparable to those that were previously documented with molecular techniques. The model also predicted that under nitrogen fixation, higher carbon and electron fluxes would be diverted toward respiration rather than biomass formation in Geobacter, providing a potential explanation for enhanced in situ U(VI) reduction in low-ammonium zones. These results show that genome-scale modeling can be a useful tool for predicting microbial interactions in subsurface environments and shows promise for designing bioremediation strategies.}, keywords = {Acetates, Anaerobiosis, Biodegradation, Environmental, Biomass, Comamonadaceae, Genome, Genome, Bacterial, Geobacter, Models, Biological, Nitrogen Fixation, Quaternary Ammonium Compounds, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Uranium, Water Microbiology, Water Pollutants, Radioactive}, issn = {1751-7370}, doi = {10.1038/ismej.2010.117}, author = {Zhuang, Kai and Izallalen, Mounir and Mouser, Paula and Richter, Hanno and Risso, Carla and Mahadevan, Radhakrishnan and Lovley, Derek R} } @article {487, title = {Electricity generation by Geobacter sulfurreducens attached to gold electrodes.}, journal = {Langmuir}, volume = {24}, year = {2008}, month = {2008 Apr 15}, pages = {4376-9}, abstract = {The versatility of gold for electrode manufacture suggests that it could be an ideal material for some microbial fuel cell applications. However, previous studies have suggested that microorganisms that readily transfer electrons to graphite do not transfer electrons to gold. Investigations with Geobacter sulfurreducens demonstrated that it could grow on gold anodes producing current nearly as effectively as with graphite anodes. Current production was associated with the development of G. sulfurreducens biofilms up to 40 microm thick. No current was produced if pilA, the gene for the structural protein of the conductive pili of G. sulfurreducens, was deleted. The finding that gold is a suitable anode material for microbial fuel cells offers expanded possibilities for the construction of microbial fuel cells and the electrochemical analysis of microbe-electrode interactions.}, keywords = {Electrodes, Electrons, Geobacter, Gold, Microscopy, Confocal, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Surface Properties}, issn = {0743-7463}, doi = {10.1021/la703469y}, author = {Richter, Hanno and McCarthy, Kevin and Nevin, Kelly P and Johnson, Jessica P and Rotello, Vincent M and Lovley, Derek R} } @article {501, title = {Lack of electricity production by Pelobacter carbinolicus indicates that the capacity for Fe(III) oxide reduction does not necessarily confer electron transfer ability to fuel cell anodes.}, journal = {Appl Environ Microbiol}, volume = {73}, year = {2007}, month = {2007 Aug}, pages = {5347-53}, abstract = {The ability of Pelobacter carbinolicus to oxidize electron donors with electron transfer to the anodes of microbial fuel cells was evaluated because microorganisms closely related to Pelobacter species are generally abundant on the anodes of microbial fuel cells harvesting electricity from aquatic sediments. P. carbinolicus could not produce current in a microbial fuel cell with electron donors which support Fe(III) oxide reduction by this organism. Current was produced using a coculture of P. carbinolicus and Geobacter sulfurreducens with ethanol as the fuel. Ethanol consumption was associated with the transitory accumulation of acetate and hydrogen. G. sulfurreducens alone could not metabolize ethanol, suggesting that P. carbinolicus grew in the fuel cell by converting ethanol to hydrogen and acetate, which G. sulfurreducens oxidized with electron transfer to the anode. Up to 83\% of the electrons available in ethanol were recovered as electricity and in the metabolic intermediate acetate. Hydrogen consumption by G. sulfurreducens was important for ethanol metabolism by P. carbinolicus. Confocal microscopy and analysis of 16S rRNA genes revealed that half of the cells growing on the anode surface were P. carbinolicus, but there was a nearly equal number of planktonic cells of P. carbinolicus. In contrast, G. sulfurreducens was primarily attached to the anode. P. carbinolicus represents the first Fe(III) oxide-reducing microorganism found to be unable to produce current in a microbial fuel cell, providing the first suggestion that the mechanisms for extracellular electron transfer to Fe(III) oxides and fuel cell anodes may be different.}, keywords = {Bacteriological Techniques, Deltaproteobacteria, Electricity, Electron Transport, Ferrous Compounds, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Confocal, Oxidation-Reduction, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S}, issn = {0099-2240}, doi = {10.1128/AEM.00804-07}, author = {Richter, Hanno and Lanthier, Martin and Nevin, Kelly P and Lovley, Derek R} }